The options that a runner may make in what athletic shoes to use can be quite crucial. Having the running footwear correct has implications for how quick they run and may affect the probability for a running injury. You will find, however, experts who do argue with that and there is definitely loads of disagreement about the concerns. You can find some studies to support both sides of this discussion, but not a lot of middle ground and it is determined by the way you would like to spin the science concerning which side of the controversy you want to believe in. The podiatry associated live talk on Facebook, PodChatLive not too long ago reviewed this topic by interviewing Dr Chris Napier, Physiotherapist and Associate Professor from the University of British Columbia (and 2:33 marathoner). PodChatLive is a frequent chat that goes out live on Facebook and then transferred to YouTube following the livestream.
During this chat on running shoes, Chris talked about his recent British Journal of Sports Medicine discussion which was relating to the logical fallacies in the athletic shoes controversy. The PodChatLive hosts and Chris spoke of just how runners (both uninjured as well as injured) should select running shoes. They referred to exactly what the evidence really does actually informs us and just what it doesn’t yet inform us. They also reviewed just how much focus and attention running footwear appears to get and questioned, is it simply all about comfort? Chris Napier is a Clinical Assistant Professor within the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of British Columbia and an associate member of the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. Chris Napier first attained his Master of Physiotherapy degree in Perth in Australia, in 2003, and then his PhD at the University of British Columbia in 2018 on running biomechanics and injury. Since becoming a physical therapist, he has specialized his training with postgrad research in manual therapy and also sport physical therapy.